{"id":18,"date":"2017-10-28T04:54:27","date_gmt":"2017-10-28T04:54:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/box5163.temp.domains\/~ulasince\/?page_id=18"},"modified":"2024-03-30T15:39:42","modified_gmt":"2024-03-30T15:39:42","slug":"peer-reviewed-articles","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.ulasince.com\/home\/peer-reviewed-articles\/","title":{"rendered":"Journal articles"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Click on the title to access the full text in PDF.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

From \u2018Chinese Colonist\u2019 to \u2018Yellow Peril\u2019: Capitalist Racialization in the British Empire, American Political Science Review,<\/em> (November 2023). Open Access.<\/strong><\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Literature on \u201cracial capitalism\u201d exhibits a tension between the term\u2019s evocative power and its conceptual imprecision. This article navigates this tension by developing the mid-level concept of \u201ccapitalist racialization,\u201d which specifies the role of capitalist abstractions in the construction of racial hierarchies. I elaborate this notion around the racialization of Chinese migration in nineteenth-century Southeast Asia. I focalize the figure of the \u201cChinese colonist\u201d as an index of the capitalist standards by which British observers ordered colonial populations in their reflections on imperial political economy. I argue that the racial stereotype of \u201cthe Chinese\u201d as a commercial, industrious, and \u201ccolonizing\u201d people emerged from the subsumption of colonial land and labor under capital. Their \u201ccolonizing\u201d capacity rendered Chinese migrants simultaneously an economic asset to the British Empire and a potential threat to the white world order. \u201cCapitalist racialization\u201d therefore highlights new inroads into the entwined histories of capitalism, racism, and empire.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Deprovincializing Racial Capitalism: John Crawfurd and Settler Colonialism in India,\u00a0American Political Science Review<\/em><\/strong><\/a> 116:1 (2022): 144-160. Open Access<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Recent literature on racial capitalism has overwhelmingly focused on the Atlantic settler-slave formation, sidelining the history of European imperialism in Asia. This article addresses this blind spot by recovering the aborted project of British settler colonialism in India through the writings of its most prominent advocate, John Crawfurd. It is argued that Crawfurd\u2019s vision of a liberal empire in India rejected slavery and indigenous dispossession yet remained deeply racialized in its conception of capital, labor, and value. Crawfurd elaborated a \u201ccapital theory of race,\u201d which derived racial categories from a civilizational spectrum keyed to the capitalist organization of production. His proposals accordingly revamped the conventional terms of colonization by representing India as overstocked with labor but vacant of capital and skill that only European settlers could provide. The article concludes with the broader implications of a trans-imperial analytic framework for writing connected histories of racial capitalism and settler colonialism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Saving Capitalism from Empire: Uses of Colonial History in New Institutional Economics, International Relations<\/em> (June 2022). Open Access.<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

This article contributes to theorising colonialism and capitalism within the same analytic frame through a critical engagement with the uses of colonial history in new institutional economics (NIE). The \u201ccolonial turn\u201d in NIE holds significant diagnostic value because although it incorporates colonialism into its account of the \u201cgreat divergence,\u201d it maintains a liberal conception of capitalism predicated on private property, competitive markets, and the rule of law. It is argued that NIE achieves this effect by admitting colonialism into its history <\/em>of capitalism while excluding it from its theory<\/em> of capitalism. By filtering colonialism through the dichotomy between \u00a0\u201cinclusive\u201d and \u201cextractive\u201d institutions, NIE upholds the categorical association of capitalist growth with inclusive institutions. Drawing on critical theories of political economy, the article shows the limits of the NIE framework by identifying forms of colonial capitalism that do not resolve into a stylised opposition between inclusion and extraction. Colonial slavery, commercial imperialism, and settler colonialism strain the inclusive\/extractive binary by highlighting (1) the interdependence of inclusive and extractive institutions in imperial networks accumulation, and (2) the violent expropriations at the origins of inclusive institutions, above all private property. Proposing to view NIE\u2019s critique of colonialism as a \u201cliberal critique of capitalist unevenness,\u201d the article concludes on broader questions about inclusion and exclusion under \u201cactually existing capitalism.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Adam Smith, Settler Colonialism, and Limits of Liberal Anti-Imperialism,\u00a0The Journal of Politics<\/em> 83:3 (2021): 1080-1096.<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Recent scholarship has claimed Adam Smith\u2019s frontal attack on the mercantile system as a precocious expression of liberal anti-imperialism. This paper argues that settler colonialism in North America represented an important exception and limit to Smith\u2019s anti-imperial commitments. Smith spared agrarian settler colonies from his invective against other imperial practices like chattel slavery and trade monopolies because of the colonies\u2019 evidentiary significance for his \u201csystem of natural liberty.\u201d Smith\u2019s embrace of settler colonies involved him in an ideological conundrum insofar as the prosperity of these settlements rested on imperial expansion and seizure of land from the indigenous peoples. Smith navigated this problem by, first, predicating colonial \u201cinjustice\u201d on conquest, slavery, and destruction, and second, describing American land as res nullius<\/i>. Together, these conceptual definitions made it possible to imagine settler colonies as originating in nonviolent acts of \u201coccupation without conquest\u201d and embodying \u201ccommerce without empire.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Between Equal Rights: Primitive Accumulation and Capital\u2019s Violence, Political Theory <\/em>46:6 (2018): 885-914.<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Abstract:\u00a0<\/strong>This paper attempts to elaborate a political theory of capital\u2019s violence. Recent analyses have adopted Karl Marx\u2019s notion of the \u201cprimitive accumulation of capital\u201d for investigating the forcible methods by which the conditions of capital accumulation are reproduced in the present. I argue that the current scholarship is limited by a certain functionalism in its theorization of ongoing primitive accumulation. The analytic function accorded to primitive accumulation, I contend, can be better performed by the concepts of \u201ccapital-positing violence\u201d and \u201ccapital-preserving violence.\u201d In coining these new concepts, I first refine the conceptual core of primitive accumulation as the coercive capitalization of social relations of reproduction, which falls into sharpest relief in the violent history of colonial capitalism. I then elucidate this conceptual core with reference to Carl Schmitt\u2019s account of European colonial expansion and Walter Benjamin\u2019s reflections on law-making and law-preserving violence. The resultant concepts of capital-positing and capital-preserving violence, I conclude, can illuminate both the historical and the quotidian operations of the politico-juridical force that has been constitutive of capitalism down to our present moment.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

\u201cBetween Commerce and Empire: David Hume, Colonial Slavery, and Commercial Incivility,\u201d\u00a0History of Political Thought<\/em>\u00a039:1 (2018): 103-127.<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Abstract<\/strong>: Eighteenth-century Enlightenment thought has recently been reclaimed as a robust, albeit short-lived, cosmopolitan critique of European imperialism. This essay complicates this interpretation through a study of David Hume\u2019s reflections on commerce, empire, and slavery. I argue that while Hume condemned the colonial system of monopoly, war, and conquest, his strictures against empire did not extend to colonial slavery in the Atlantic. This was because colonial slavery represented a manifestly\u00a0uncivil<\/em>\u00a0institution when judged by enlightened metropolitan sensibilities, yet also a decisively\u00a0commercial<\/em>\u00a0institution pivotal to the eighteenth-century global economy. Confronted by the paradoxical \u201ccommercial incivility\u201d of modern slavery, Hume opted for disavowing the link between slavery and commerce, and confined his criticism of slavery to its ancient, feudal, and Asiatic incarnations. I contend that Hume\u2019s disavowal of the commercial barbarism of the Atlantic economy is part of a broader ideological effort to separate the idea of commerce from its imperial origins and posit it as the liberal antithesis of empire. The implications of analysis, I conclude, go beyond the eighteenth-century debates over commerce and empire, and more generally pertain to the contradictory entwinement of liberalism and capitalism.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

\u201cBringing the Economy Back In: Hannah Arendt, Karl Marx, and the Politics of Capitalism,\u201d\u00a0The Journal of Politics<\/em>\u00a078:2 (April 2016): 411-426.<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Abstract:\u00a0<\/strong>This essay engages with the question of how to construct modern economic relations as an object of political theorizing by placing Hannah Arendt and Karl Marx\u2019s writings in critical conversation. I contend that the political aspect of capitalism comes into sharpest relief less in relations of economic\u00a0exploitation<\/em>\u00a0than in moments of\u00a0expropriation<\/em>\u00a0that produce and reproduce the conditions of capitalist accumulation. To develop a theoretical handle on expropriation, and thereby on the politics of capitalism, I syncretically draw upon Marxian and Arendtian concepts by, first, examining expropriation through the Marxian analytic of \u201cprimitive accumulation of capital\u201d and, second, delineating the political agency behind primitive accumulation through the Arendtian notion of \u201cpower.\u201d I substantiate these connections around colonial histories of primitive accumulation wherein expropriation emerges as a terrain of political contestation. From this perspective, I conclude, such putatively \u201ceconomic\u201d questions as dispossession, exploitation, and accumulation appear as irreducibly political questions.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

\u201cFriedrich List and the Imperial Origins of the National Economy,\u201d\u00a0New Political Economy,<\/em>\u00a021:4 (April 2016): 380-400.<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Abstract:<\/strong>\u00a0This essay offers a critical reexamination of the works of Friedrich List by placing them in the context of nineteenth-century imperial economies. I argue that List\u2019s theory of the national economy is characterised by a major ambivalence, as it incorporates both imperial and anti-imperial elements. On the one hand, List pitted his national principle against the British imperialism of free trade and the relations of dependency it heralded for late developers like Germany. On the other hand, his economic nationalism aimed less at dismantling imperial core-periphery relations as a whole than at reproducing these relations domestically and expanding them globally. I explain this ambivalence with reference to List\u2019s designation of imperial Britain as the prime example of successful economic development and a model to be emulated by late industrialisers. List thereby fashioned his ideas on national development out of the historical experience of an empire whereby he internalised its economic logic and discourse of the civilising mission. Consequently, List\u2019s national economy culminated in an early vision of the global north-south relations, in which the global industrial-financial core would expand to include France, Germany, and the Unites States, while the rest of the world would be reduced to quasi-colonial agrarian hinterlands.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

\u201cPrimitive Accumulation, the New Enclosures, and Global Land Grabs: A Theoretical Intervention,\u201d\u00a0Rural Sociology<\/em>\u00a079:1 (March 2014): 104-131.<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Abstract:\u00a0<\/strong>This essay stages a theoretical intervention in the growing literature on \u201cglobal land grabs.\u201d The triple crisis of finance, food, and energy in 2008 has prompted powerful transnational actors to acquire massive expanses of farmland in the Global South. Recent critical analyses of this process have variously invoked global capitalism and neocolonialism to account for this trend. One line of inquiry approaches land grabs as instances of \u201cprimitive accumulation of capital\u201d whereby lands in the Global South are \u201cenclosed\u201d and brought within the ambit of global capitalism. Another perspective invokes the history of Anglo-American colonialism for critiquing the developmentalist discourse that depicts Africa as the \u201clast frontier\u201d to be tamed by the techno-industrial civilization of the North. This essay integrates these two perspectives by elaborating capitalism as an irreducibly colonial formation with global inceptions. I begin with a discussion of \u201cprimitive accumulation\u201d and, counter to many, question the suitability of \u201cenclosure\u201d for interpreting land grabs. The second section delves into the theoretical origins of primitive accumulation, proposing to situate it in a global and colonial genealogy of capitalism. A\u00a0final section charts the theoretical and historical contours of this global genealogy and arrives at a more capacious reconceptualization of primitive accumulation. I conclude by reflecting on the implications of contemporary land grabs for\u00a0in situ\u00a0<\/em>displacement, the fungibility of land, and new enclosures in the contemporary reconfiguration of global value chains.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

\u201cNot A Partnership in Pepper, Coffee, Calico or Tobacco: Edmund Burke and the Vicissitudes of Colonial Capitalism,\u201d\u00a0Polity<\/em>, 44:3 (July 2012): 340-372.<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Abstract:\u00a0<\/strong>This essay examines the tensions between liberalism and capitalism through an analysis of Edmund Burke\u2019s works on eighteenth-century liberal political economy and, specifically, the challenges posed by colonial capitalism. When criticizing the East India Company, Burke attempted to fortify \u201ccommercial\u201d principles, on which British self-image rested, against the \u201crapacious\u201d policies of British imperialism in India, which threatened this liberal self-image. His denunciation of the Company thus can be construed as an index to broader contradictions between the liberal self-image of capitalism and the coercive processes of colonial displacement and extraction that were an integral part of capitalism\u2019s emergence. The article, in its conclusion, outlines some theoretical and methodological issues that arise from situating Burke\u2019s writings in their colonial and capitalist contexts.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

\u201cEnclosing in God\u2019s Name, Accumulating for Mankind: Money, Morality and Accumulation in John Locke\u2019s Theory of Property,\u201d\u00a0The Review of Politics<\/em>\u00a073:1 (Winter 2011): 29-54.<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Abstract:\u00a0<\/strong>John Locke\u2019s theory of property has been the subject of sustained contention between two major perspectives: a socio-economic perspective, which conceives Locke\u2019s thought as an expression of the rising bourgeois sensibility and a defense of the nascent capitalist relations, and a theological perspective, which prioritizes his moral worldview grounded in the Christian natural law tradition. This essay argues that a closer analysis of Locke\u2019s theory of money in the\u00a0Second Treatise<\/em>\u00a0can provide an alternative to this binary. It maintains that the notion of money comprises a conceptual area of indeterminacy in which the theological universals of the natural law and the historical fact of capital accumulation shade into each other. More specifically, the ambiguity of the status of money enables Locke to navigate an antinomy within the natural law to the effect of establishing a relation of\u00a0necessity<\/em>\u00a0between the divine\u00a0telos<\/em>\u00a0and accumulative practices.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n<\/body>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Click on the title to access the full text in PDF. From \u2018Chinese Colonist\u2019 to \u2018Yellow Peril\u2019: Capitalist Racialization in the British Empire, American Political Science Review, (November 2023). Open Access. Literature on \u201cracial capitalism\u201d exhibits a tension between the term\u2019s evocative power and its conceptual imprecision. This article navigates this tension by developing the … Continue reading “Journal articles”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-18","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"yoast_head":"\nJournal articles - Onur Ulas Ince<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.ulasince.com\/home\/peer-reviewed-articles\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Journal articles - Onur Ulas Ince\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Click on the title to access the full text in PDF. From \u2018Chinese Colonist\u2019 to \u2018Yellow Peril\u2019: Capitalist Racialization in the British Empire, American Political Science Review, (November 2023). Open Access. Literature on \u201cracial capitalism\u201d exhibits a tension between the term\u2019s evocative power and its conceptual imprecision. This article navigates this tension by developing the … Continue reading "Journal articles"\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.ulasince.com\/home\/peer-reviewed-articles\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Onur Ulas Ince\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-03-30T15:39:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/www.ulasince.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Ince-2023-From-Chinese-Colonist-to-Yellow-Peril.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"12 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ulasince.com\\\/home\\\/peer-reviewed-articles\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ulasince.com\\\/home\\\/peer-reviewed-articles\\\/\",\"name\":\"Journal articles - Onur Ulas Ince\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ulasince.com\\\/home\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ulasince.com\\\/home\\\/peer-reviewed-articles\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ulasince.com\\\/home\\\/peer-reviewed-articles\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/www.ulasince.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/Ince-2023-From-Chinese-Colonist-to-Yellow-Peril.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-10-28T04:54:27+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-03-30T15:39:42+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ulasince.com\\\/home\\\/peer-reviewed-articles\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ulasince.com\\\/home\\\/peer-reviewed-articles\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ulasince.com\\\/home\\\/peer-reviewed-articles\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"http:\\\/\\\/www.ulasince.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/Ince-2023-From-Chinese-Colonist-to-Yellow-Peril.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/www.ulasince.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/Ince-2023-From-Chinese-Colonist-to-Yellow-Peril.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ulasince.com\\\/home\\\/peer-reviewed-articles\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ulasince.com\\\/home\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Journal articles\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ulasince.com\\\/home\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ulasince.com\\\/home\\\/\",\"name\":\"Onur Ulas Ince\",\"description\":\"Associate Professor of Political Theory, SOAS University of London\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ulasince.com\\\/home\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Journal articles - Onur Ulas Ince","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.ulasince.com\/home\/peer-reviewed-articles\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Journal articles - Onur Ulas Ince","og_description":"Click on the title to access the full text in PDF. From \u2018Chinese Colonist\u2019 to \u2018Yellow Peril\u2019: Capitalist Racialization in the British Empire, American Political Science Review, (November 2023). Open Access. Literature on \u201cracial capitalism\u201d exhibits a tension between the term\u2019s evocative power and its conceptual imprecision. This article navigates this tension by developing the … Continue reading \"Journal articles\"","og_url":"https:\/\/www.ulasince.com\/home\/peer-reviewed-articles\/","og_site_name":"Onur Ulas Ince","article_modified_time":"2024-03-30T15:39:42+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/www.ulasince.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Ince-2023-From-Chinese-Colonist-to-Yellow-Peril.jpg","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"12 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.ulasince.com\/home\/peer-reviewed-articles\/","url":"https:\/\/www.ulasince.com\/home\/peer-reviewed-articles\/","name":"Journal articles - Onur Ulas Ince","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.ulasince.com\/home\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.ulasince.com\/home\/peer-reviewed-articles\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.ulasince.com\/home\/peer-reviewed-articles\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/www.ulasince.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Ince-2023-From-Chinese-Colonist-to-Yellow-Peril.jpg","datePublished":"2017-10-28T04:54:27+00:00","dateModified":"2024-03-30T15:39:42+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.ulasince.com\/home\/peer-reviewed-articles\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.ulasince.com\/home\/peer-reviewed-articles\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.ulasince.com\/home\/peer-reviewed-articles\/#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/www.ulasince.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Ince-2023-From-Chinese-Colonist-to-Yellow-Peril.jpg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/www.ulasince.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Ince-2023-From-Chinese-Colonist-to-Yellow-Peril.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.ulasince.com\/home\/peer-reviewed-articles\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.ulasince.com\/home\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Journal articles"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.ulasince.com\/home\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.ulasince.com\/home\/","name":"Onur Ulas Ince","description":"Associate Professor of Political Theory, SOAS University of London","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.ulasince.com\/home\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/P9k8Zi-i","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":3,"url":"https:\/\/www.ulasince.com\/home\/","url_meta":{"origin":18,"position":0},"title":"Home","author":"admin","date":"October 28, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"I am an Associate Professor of Political Theory at SOAS University of London. In 2024, I was awarded a British Academy\/Leverhulme Senior Research Fellowship and The Britain and Ireland Association for Political Thought Mid-Career Prize. My research has further received the 2020 Spitz Prize by the International Conference for the\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.ulasince.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Profile-pic-SOAS-Sepia-edited-5.jpeg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.ulasince.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Profile-pic-SOAS-Sepia-edited-5.jpeg?resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.ulasince.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Profile-pic-SOAS-Sepia-edited-5.jpeg?resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.ulasince.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Profile-pic-SOAS-Sepia-edited-5.jpeg?resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.ulasince.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Profile-pic-SOAS-Sepia-edited-5.jpeg?resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1141,"url":"https:\/\/www.ulasince.com\/home\/before-the-color-line-empire-capitalism-and-race-in-asia-1800-1850-in-progress\/","url_meta":{"origin":18,"position":1},"title":"Before the Color Line: Empire, Capitalism, and Race in Asia (under contract with Oxford UP)","author":"admin","date":"April 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Before the Color Line is a book in political theory and intellectual history that makes three theoretical interventions in the burgeoning literature on the entwinement of capitalism, race, and colonialism. First, the book illuminates the \u201cprehistory of the global color line\u201d by locating the ideational antecedents of nineteenth-century racial categories\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":13,"url":"https:\/\/www.ulasince.com\/home\/book-colonial-capitalism-and-the-dilemmas-of-liberalism\/","url_meta":{"origin":18,"position":2},"title":"Colonial Capitalism and the Dilemmas of Liberalism (Oxford UP, 2018)","author":"admin","date":"October 28, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Colonial Capitalism and the Dilemmas of Liberalism (Oxford University Press, 2018) Winner of the 2020 David and Elaine Spitz Prize, International Conference for the Study of Political Thought Finalist for the 2020 C. B. Macpherson Prize, Canadian Political Science Association (Introduction and the table of contents available for download here)\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.ulasince.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/Comp_R2_ColonialCapitalism_Ince-674x1024.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":1147,"url":"https:\/\/www.ulasince.com\/home\/research-and-publications\/","url_meta":{"origin":18,"position":3},"title":"Publications","author":"admin","date":"April 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Please follow the links below for details and PDFs. Colonial Capitalism and the Dilemmas of Liberalism (Oxford University Press, 2018) (ToC and introduction) Articles in peer-reviewed journals (abstracts and PDFs) Book chapters Book reviews and review essays Research in progress","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":45,"url":"https:\/\/www.ulasince.com\/home\/book-reviews-and-review-essays\/","url_meta":{"origin":18,"position":4},"title":"Book reviews and review essays","author":"admin","date":"October 28, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cImperial Pasts, Imperial Presents\u201d (review article), Jeanne Morefield, Empires Without Imperialism (Oxford University Press, 2014); Andrew Fitzmaurice, Sovereignty, Property, and Empire (Cambridge University Press, 2014).\u00a0European Journal of Political Theory\u00a016:4 (2017): 470-480. Daniel O\u2019Neill, Edmund Burke and the Conservative Logic of Empire (Oakland: University of California Press, 2016).\u00a0Review of Politics (November\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":29,"url":"https:\/\/www.ulasince.com\/home\/invited-talks-and-conference-presentations\/","url_meta":{"origin":18,"position":5},"title":"Invited talks","author":"admin","date":"October 28, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cCapitalism and Race in Imperial Perspective: Beyond Methodological Atlanticism,\u201d King\u2019s College London (January 2024, London) \u201cFrom \u2018Civilization\u2019 to \u2018Race\u2019: The Political Economy of Imperial Subjecthood,\u201d University of Oxford, Political Theory Workshop (October 2023, Oxford);\u00a0 University College Dublin and Australian Catholic University, Subjecthood in the Nineteenth-Century Anglosphere Workshop (August 2023, Rome)\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ulasince.com\/home\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/18","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ulasince.com\/home\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ulasince.com\/home\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ulasince.com\/home\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ulasince.com\/home\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18"}],"version-history":[{"count":42,"href":"https:\/\/www.ulasince.com\/home\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/18\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1354,"href":"https:\/\/www.ulasince.com\/home\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/18\/revisions\/1354"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ulasince.com\/home\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}